jeremy corbyn train footage

i am so confused by jeremy corbyn and the recent train footage where he sits down. i want to support him as he promises free money for people like me so i dont have to find work. i also like his communist views and songs but when i see him only pretending to be a communist by sitting down when there are seats available on a train i think he is pretending to be a marter.

maybe the clothes he wears are also an act and he is being Faux Povvo instead of genuinly dressing badly. the whole reason that everyone likes him is becuase he comes accross as an underdog and every time he turns up to parliment dressed like a tramp upsets the establishment.

 i will still vote for jeremy corbyn but would like to see him be more impoverish in the future and actually mean it so he can teach the conservatives a lesson. being in a position of power means he now gets things free and is expected to dress up for a queen who he hates, but his roots are about being poor and musky. he is in the same predictment as when rappers from crompton get wealthy then noone takes them seriously when they sing about being in da hood when they now live in gated communitys. we jeremy corbyn supporters must close ranks and ignore this train footage evidence  planted by corporate fat cats and perpetuted by all the media.

jeremy corbyn

the guardian newspaper stance on europe

i am very baffelled when i read the gaurdian website to find more information about europe. 

they try to scare me to vote to stay in europe so everyone can benefit from using businesses abroad and then they preach its bad for david cameran to use businesses like banks abroad. they are hypercrites and their readers scare me with the comments they leave.

europe

it seems only certain black lives matter #blacklivesmatter

a lot of americans using the #blacklivesmatter tag on twitter complain that black people have less job opportunities than white people and keep getting shot. then the same people write nasty things wishing President Barack Obama was gone. these people need to make their mind up. personally i think he is the best leader of my generation.

Bla'Ck lives matter

Virgin Media chaka khan i feel for you party video

an advertisment for virgin media internet has been playing on the tv recently which confuses and angers me. in the video which lasts approximatly one minute sees a house full of annoying young people dancing to chaka khan i feel for you. then the DJ leaves at the end without a valid reason but everyone jeers him / her / it to keep playing but it leaves anyway. watch it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4OYmgj4J0U

i am confused by the narritive, either:

a) the advert is real time. therefore the DJ plays a 3rd of chaka khan i feel for you  then tries to bugger off. if a DJ did that I wouldnt pay them. the crowd have every right to jeer them. why would a DJ travel all the way to a venue just to play the intro to a song then want to go home? this scenario probably didnt happen.

b)  the advert is set over the entire length of the party and edited down to one minute. this then assumes that the DJ played the same chaka khan i feel for you track all night as we the viewer see segmetns of time with everyone listening to the same song. if a DJ played the same track repeatly over and over again the jeering would come a lot sooner and they would be thrown out of the party via the window. this is also unlikely to happen although radio one did that for weeks when the ferrel williams happy song came out and noone complained. maybe listening habits have changed. as soon as the dj leaves a man chimes in with an ipad and starts playing chaka khan i feel for you - the same music that has driven everyone up the wall for the last 4 hours solid and got the last DJ jeered at. instead the ipad owner is hailed as some sort of god for playing the one possible song on the planet that noone wants to hear then virgin media are deemed as solver of all the worlds problems. there are plenty of other 80s classics but not a single person in the party had the common sense to turn off the router and drop some agadoo.

c) the advert is in realtime and the virgin media tarrif ran out within one minute thereby stopping the dj from streaming music. in my experience of using virgin media services this is the most likely scenario although why would virgin pay for an advert saying how limited their service was? this confuses me.

also:

1) if i was a parent responsible deciding which broadband provider to go for (because i strongly suspect not a single one of these revellers was the homeowner) why would i purchase a tarriff if it encourages 100 students to turn up at my house while i'm on holiday, scrawl confidetial password information on my furnitrure in lipstick, deafen the neighbours, copulate with my vegetables then drop a deuce on the lounge carpet.

2) There is a man wearing a wooly hat indoors.

3) someone brought an ipad to a party.

maybe i am over thinking this and maybe i am angry because i will never be invited to a party full of pretty girls. or maybe i am angry because all the men in the party have beards that make them look like terrorists and pirates. but maybe i am angry becuase the terrorists will score with the pretty girls while i am stuck at home watching them less than a week after virgin media threatened to take me to court for late payment. this has tainted chaka khan i feel for you, i am going to bed.

i feel for her

the north face

i am confused as to why north face jacketts have the north face logo on the back at not on the front. in the world of property and sex the rear entrance is typically accossiated with the south face, not the north. the company who makes these overpriced jackets for pompous people should either rebrand or move the logo on the front to prevent any further confusion and anger.